Papers & Comments

ATTENTION: All views and opinions expressed in the following materials are solely those of Joseph A. Laronge and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of any of his affiliations. And all information is provided solely for academic educational purposes. No legal advice is provided or intended. All rights reserved.

Evaluating Universal Sufficiency of a Single Logical Form for Inference in Court

Joseph A. Laronge
Law Probability & Risk 2012
DOI 10-1093lprmgs005.pdf

PDF: http://lpr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/mgs005?ijkey=BdvkTIOCaGhMjG2&keytype=ref
————————————————————————————————————————
Evaluating Universal Sufficiency of a Single Logical Form for Inference in Court

Joseph A. Laronge
13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Law (ICAIL 2011) / AI & Evidential Inference Workshop Paper

PDF: https://inferenceincourt.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/laronge-icail-2011-workshop-paper-pdf-final.pdf

————————————————————————————————————————

A Generalizable Argument Structure Using Defeasible Class-inclusion Transitivity for Evaluating Evidentiary Probative Relevancy in Litigation

Joseph A. Laronge
Journal of Logic and Computation 2009; doi: 10.1093/logcom/exp066

Abstract: http://logcom.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/exp066?
ijkey=NBFhGLqyDdPMcnX&keytype=ref

PDF: http://logcom.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/exp066?
ijkey=NBFhGLqyDdPMcnX&keytype=ref

————————————————————————————————————————

A NATURAL LANGUAGE UNIVERSAL LOGIC CODING TEMPLATE FOR ARGUMENTATION: Using the Defeasible Class-Inclusion Transitivity Logic Algorithm

Joseph A. Laronge (unpublished draft paper, 2013)

PDF:
https://inferenceincourt.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/dcit-universal-logic-algorithm.pdf

————————————————————————————————————————

Replacing Inference-Rule Heuristics with Defeasible Class-inclusion Transitivity for Ensuring A Structurally Correct Inference in Court

Joseph A. Laronge  (unpublished draft paper, 2009)

PDF:
https://inferenceincourt.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/replacing-rough-inference-rule-heuristics-with-dcit-laronge.pdf

————————————————————————————————————————

Accounting for Any Ancillary Evidence with Defeasible Class-inclusion Transitivity To Ensure A Complete Argument  Structure for Inference in Court

Joseph A. Laronge  (comment, 2009)

PDF: https://inferenceincourt.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/accounting-for-any-ancillary-evidence.pdf

————————————————————————————————————————

Reaching Logical Conclusions in Court: A General Structure for Inferential Lines of Reasoning

Joseph A. Laronge  (unpublished draft paper, 2010)

PDF: https://inferenceincourt.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/reaching-logical-conclusion-in-court-3.pdf

————————————————————————————————————————
A Brief Comparison of Argument Modeling with Carneades and DCIT Using Pierson v. Post

Joseph A. Laronge (unpublished draft paper, July 2010)

PDF: https://inferenceincourt.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/pierson-v-post-carneades-and-dcit-2010.pdf

————————————————————————————————————————
Visualizing Probative Relevancy: Transitive Chains vs. Tree-Like Argument Structures

Joseph A. Laronge (rejected submission to Informal Logic, May 2006)

PDF: https://inferenceincourt.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/informal-logic-submission-visualizing-probative-relevancy-0507061.pdf

————————————————————————————————————————
Solving the GRE Analyze Argument Task Test

Joseph A. Laronge

PDF: https://inferenceincourt.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/gre-argument-task-demo.pdf

Advertisements